(a) HUMAN PHILOSOPHY; OR, KNOWLEDGE OF MAN. I. OBJECTIONS 2. ADVANTAGE 1. Preliminary cons 2. Division of learn 1. MAN AS AN INDIVIDUAL. 153. 1. The UN } 1. THE EXCELLENCE OF AND OF DISSEMINATING 2. WHAT HAS BEEN DONE 2. MAN IN SOCIETY. 256. 2. The DI 1. Of CONVERSA Of NEGOCIATI 3. Of GOVERNMH 2. Metaphysics. 136. C { 1. Division. Mathematics. 143. 1. Experimental. 154. 2. Philosophical. 145. 3. Magical. 147. 1. Calendar of inventions. 148. 2. Appendices.) 2. Calendar of discoveries. 148. OF MAN. 153.(a) LITERATE EXPERIENCE. 182. rary. osophical. ART CRITICAL. ART OF INSTRUCTION. II. What has been done for the advancement of learn To clear the way, and, as it were, to make silence, to have the true testimonies concerning the dignity of learning to be better heard, without the interruption of tacit objections. OBJECTIONS WHICH DIVINES MAKE TO LEARNING. 1. The aspiring to Knowledge was the cause of the fall 2. Knowledge generates pride 7 8 • 3. Solomon says there is no end of making books, and he that increases knowledge increases anxiety 10 b We must not so place our felicity in knowledge as to forget our mortality: but to give ourselves repose and contentment, and not presume by the contemplation of nature to attain to the mysteries of God. 4. St. Paul warns us not to be spoiled through vain philosophy 12 The sense of man resembles the sun, which opens and reveals the terrestrial globe but conceals the stars and celestial globe: hence men fall who seek to fly up to the secrets of the Deity by the waxen wings of the senses. 5. Learned men are inclined to be heretics, and learned men to atheism • 12 It is an assured truth and a conclusion of experience, that a little or superficial knowledge of philosophy may incline the mind of man to atheism, but a further proceeding therein doth bring the mind back again to religion. Let no man, upon a weak conceit of sobriety, or an illapplied moderation, think or maintain, that a man can earch too far, or be too well studied in the book of God's word, or in the book of God's works; Divinity or Philosophy. OBJECTIONS WHICH POLITITIANS MAKE TO LEARNING. 1. Learning softens men's minds and makes them unfit for arms 14 Alexander the Great and Julius Cæsar the dictator; whereof the one was Aristotle's scholar in philosophy, and the other was Cicero's rival in eloquence: or if any man had rather call for scholars that were great generals, than generals that were great scholars, let him take Epaminondas the Theban, or Xenophon the Athenian. 2. Learning makes men unfit for civil affairs • • 16 It is accounted an error to commit a natural body to empiric physicians, which commonly have a few pleasing receipts, whereupon they are confident and adventurous, but know neither the causes of diseases, nor the complexions of patients, nor peril of accidents, nor the true method of cures; we see it is a like error to rely upon advocates or lawyers, which are only men of practice, and not grounded in their books, who are many times easily surprised, when matter falleth out besides their experience to the prejudice of the causes they handle: so by like reason, it cannot be but a matter of doubtful consequence, if states be managed by empiric statesmen, not well mingled with men grounded in learning. 1. It makes them irresolute by variety of reading 14 It teacheth them when and upon what ground to resolve, and to carry things in suspense till they resolve. 19 3. It makes them too peremtory by strictness of rules It teacheth them when and upon what ground to resolve; yea, and how to carry things in suspense without prejudice, till they resolve; if it make men positive and regular, it teacheth them what things are in their nature demonstrative, and what are conjectural; and as well the use of distinctions and exceptions, as the latitude of principles and rules. 4. It makes them immoderate by greatness of example 14 It teacheth men the force of circumstances, the errors of 'comparisons, and all the cautions of application. It makes them incompatible by dissimilitude of examples 19 Let a man look into the errors of Clement the seventh, so livelily described by Guicciardine, who served under him, or into the errors of Cicero, painted out by his own pencil in his epistles to Atticus, and he will fly apace from being irresolute. Let him look into the errors of Phocion, and he will beware how he be obstinate or inflexible. Let him but read the fable of Ixion, and it will hold him from being vapourous or imaginative. Let him look into the errors of Cato the second, and he will never be one of the Antipodes, to tread opposite to the present world 6. It disposes men to leisure and retirement. It were strange if that, which accustometh the mind to a perpetual motion and agitation, should induce slothful |